NEHRP Clearinghouse
displaying 51 - 60 results in total 116
Britz, K. I.; Libby, L.; Hadinata, D.
Integration of Seismic Design Principles into Preliminary Architectural Design.
National Science Foundation, Washington, DC., June 1981, 87 p.
Keywords: Seismic design; Earthquake resistant structures; Architects; Seismic risk; Structural design; Design standards; Earthquake engineering; Eastern Region (United States); Building codes; Attitude surveys; Design criteria; Dynamic structural analysisHeins, C. P.; Lin, I. C.
Equivalent Seismic Design of Curved Box Girder Bridges.
National Science Foundation, Washington, DC., February 1982, 179 p.
Keywords: Seismic design; Earthquake resistant structures; Mathematical models; Computer applications; Dynamic response; Earthquake engineering; Resonant frequency; Girder bridges; Design criteriaMoore, G. B.; Yin, R. K.
Innovations in Earthquake and Natural Hazards Research: Unreinforced Masonry Buildings.
National Science Foundation, Washington, DC., July 1983, 61 p.
Keywords: Masonry; Earthquake resistant structures; Cost effectiveness; Technology innovation; Renovating; Buildings; Earthquake engineering; Ground motion; Design criteria; Earthquakes; Dynamic structural analysisVaidya, N. R.; Eggenberger, A. J.
Feasibility Evaluation of Base Isolation for the Aseismic Design of Structures.
National Science Foundation, Washington, DC., January 1984, 130 p.
Keywords: Elastomers; Seismic design; Earthquake resistant structures; Seismic waves; Mathematical models; Dynamic response; Buildings; Earthquake engineering; Ground motion; Base isolation; Bearings; Design criteriaDouglas, B.; Iwasaki, T.
Proceedings of the USA-Japan Bridge Engineering Workshop (1st) Held at Public Works Research Institute, Tsukuba (Japan) on February 20-22, 1984.
National Science Foundation, Washington, DC., January 1984, 218 p.
Identifying Number(s): CCEER-84/2
Keywords: ; Bridges (Structures); Earthquake resistant structures; Field tests; Performance evaluation; Meetings; Highway bridges; Soil mechanics; Design criteriaNEHRP Recommended Provisions for Seismic Regulations for New Buildings and Other Structures. Part 2. Commentary. 2000 Edition.
Federal Emergency Management Agency, Washington, DC., March 2001, 460 p.
Keywords: Structural engineering; Seismic design; Earthquakes resistant structures; Provisions; Quality assurance; Regulations; Construction materials; Structural design; Design standards; Earthquake engineering; National Earthquake Hazard Reduction Program (NEHRAP); NEHRP (National Earthquake Hazard Reduction Program); Building codes; Design criteria; Dynamic structural analysisMostafa, K.; Sanders, D.; Saiidi, M. S.
Impact of Aspect Ratio on Two-Column Bent Seismic Performance.
California State Dept. of Transportation, Sacramento.; National Science Foundation, Washington, DC., March 2004, 594 p.
Identifying Number(s): CCEER-04-03
Keywords: ; Bridges (Structures); Static loads; Columns (Supports); Hinges; Performance evaluation; Joints (Junctions); Beam tests; Concrete structures; Impact; Loads (Forces); Seismic effects; Design criteria; EarthquakesProceedings of the Fifth National Seismic Conference on Bridges and Highways: Innovations in Earthquake Engineering for Highway Structures Held September 18-20, 2006.
Federal Highway Administration, Washington, DC., September 2006,
Identifying Number(s): MCEER-06-SP09
Keywords: Seismic design; Retrofitting; Implementation; Geological hazards; Lessons learned; Load resistance factor design (LRFD); Structural design; Natural hazards; Earthquake engineering; Foundations (Structures); Meetings; Highway bridges; Infrastructure; Transportation systems; Seismic effects; Design criteria; Load resistanceShusto, L. M.; Schoof, C. C.
Incorporation of Azimuthal Dependence in a Model of Strong Ground Motion.
National Science Foundation, Washington, DC. Div. of Industrial Science and Technological Innovation., July 1985, 67 p.
Identifying Number(s): FAAA-PA-R-85-07-17
Keywords: Azimuth; Earthquake resistant structures; Mathematical models; Seismology; Ground motion; Earthquakes; Seismic effects; Design criteriaRecommendations for the Strong-Motion Program in the United States.
National Science Foundation, Washington, DC., July 1987, 68 p.
Identifying Number(s): CETS-EE-006
Keywords: ; Economic factors; Earthquake resistant structures; Bursting; Earthquakes; Hazards; Safety; Motion; Seismographs; Design criteria; Geological faults